Killing America

Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)

Published in 2012, Killing America is a unique form of satire. It shows how we have progressed so much in the eight subsequent years. Before the 2020 Covid Progressive Rot Riot Age, we had a great economic boom and seems we all got along fine. Meanwhile, the progressive rage cooked in the background. Killing America illustrates the actions of this Marxist movement. We live in a despicable and unnecessary new normal. For critical thinkers, the Marxist agenda is no longer a hidden secret. Our progressive law makers make no attempt to denounce the looting, rioting, murder, and disruption. They have affection for their beloved “mostly peaceful protests.” A particular progressive congressperson proclaimed Antifa is a myth. The other side of the isle, with few exceptions, show weakness.

Currently those trying expose the truth about the 2020 Covid Progressive Rot Riot Age face a hellish resistance. They are subject to ridicule, censorship, violence, doxing, job loss, and death. The progressives in the media and law-making organs claim the truthers are homophobic, transphobic, racist, misogynic, xenophobic, climate denier, Karen, Covid deniers, alt-right, ad nauseum. Shout and shut down your adversary to avoid the facts. It is a dangerous society when open and honest debate is no longer possible. In the years leading up the Progressive Rot Riot Age, conservative pundits faced danger. They endured shout down and expulsion from events at colleges and universities. So, I have an added item for the Progressive Playbook – shut down and shout over people who know history, values, and morals.

I would like to thank Jersey Bill for sending his wonderful book to the Fred R Smith Blog for posting. Enjoy this very entertaining and special edition of Fredrick R. Smith Speaks.

KILLING AMERICA

The Progressive Playbook

Jersey Bill, 2012

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We owe a huge debt of gratitude to the Progressive leaders and institutions that have shaped the Progressive Agenda and are committed to Killing America. They are too numerous to mention, but they include names like Clinton, Gore, Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, Frank, Dodd, Reid, Durbin, Sharpton, Jackson, many members of the Black Congressional Caucus, most large city mayors, Fannie and Freddie, ACORN, SEIU, the National Education Association, other public unions, Hollywood, most of the media, and college professors everywhere.

DEDICATION

To today’s college graduates, college and high school students, and other young Americans who, with the help of their Progressive teachers and professors, have selflessly, unflinchingly and unquestioningly agreed to do without jobs, dramatically lower their standard of living, and take on trillions of dollars of debt to pay for the Progressive Agenda.

Stated Philosophy

America is evil. It was founded on slavery. It stole the land of Native Americans. It committed genocide. It poisoned the earth. It usurped the world’s resources. It took over countries and stole their riches. It started wars. It killed the black, brown and yellow populations worldwide. Today, America enslaves African Americans. It kills gay people. It subjugates women. It starts wars. It is hateful, greedy, corrupt, homicidal, avaricious, homophobic, and sexist. It rapes the earth. It has caused the oceans to rise and the earth to fry. It executes innocent minorities. It kills immigrants. It steals wealth from the middle class and gives it to corrupt businessmen. It keeps poor people poor as the rich grow richer. America is evil. It is the worst country on earth. It needs to be punished. It must be killed.

This Progressive Playbook explains how we will do this.

Unstated Objective

We are the Progressive Power Elite. We want power. Power over all American institutions. The power to create a new world and the power to destroy the old. Economic power. Political power. Cultural power. It is power that will enable us to assume all policy-making authority regarding all aspects of American life, and decision making authority over the lives of every American.

This will not be easy. We need to create a new belief system in America. We will undermine and destroy those institutions that foster the power of the individual, and we will replace them with institutions that promote the supremacy of the State.

This is the Progressive Agenda.

Specifically, we will move from the old to the Progressive, radically altering and forcibly removing evil forces that are in our way. Examples include the following:

Three Phases

We are talking about Change. Big change. Change of this magnitude will require a phased approach. In Phase 1, we will focus on such strategies as Media, Entertainment, Education, Race, Marriage, and the Courts. In this phase, we will create a new generation of dependency. We will turn citizens who once depended on themselves, their families, and traditional institutions, into people who expect their well-being to come from the State. The goal of this phase is to ensure that the majority of American citizens are unmotivated, lack the skills to succeed on their own, cannot think critically, and pay no taxes. We will rely on these dependent people to vote into office those Progressive lawmakers who, in turn, will tax away the wealth of the rich minority for the benefit of the dependent majority.

In Phase 2, we will mobilize the foot soldiers created in Phase 1 to overwhelm the financial resources of the United States with demands that cannot be fulfilled. We will use the rhetoric of hope and change to create unreachable expectations, and then we will use the tools of envy and class warfare to blame the rich and their traditional institutions for these expectations going unmet. This will lead to social chaos and financial meltdown that we need to cause traditional institutions, already under enormous stress from Phase 1, to finally crumble and cease to exist. We will take over private companies and entire industries that we will have demonized, subpoenaed, strangled with new regulations, taxed excessively, and rendered unable to compete with the State.

It is then in Phase 3 that the Progressive Power Elite will have the mandate to create a new and complete Socialist/Marxist system. This will require the continued direction of significant financial resources to lawmakers, judges, union leaders, media, and other parties that promote the Progressive Agenda. The State takeovers of companies and industries will provide enough cash to meet our expressed goals — and continue to provide us with the enormous personal riches we began to enjoy in Phase 1!

Strategies:

How do we do all this? Through the aggressive pursuit of seventeen strategies. They are interrelated and are equally important. We must recognize that our intent in each must be cloaked with carefully-scripted words and messages so as to avoid raising undue suspicion, at least in the beginning. We will rely on the non-controversial themes of fairness, equality, choice, level playing field, hope, change, paying one’s fair share, non-judgmental, and tolerance to mask the radical nature of the Progressive revolution we will unleash.

Media:

We will take over the media. We will ensure that 95% of editors, writers, and commentators are Progressive. We will blur opinion and fact. We will pose as independent while aggressively promoting the Progressive Agenda, Progressive policies, and Progressive politicians. We will attack any media source that offers an opinion not our own. We will stifle dissent. We will vilify those we disagree with. We will pass laws restricting the right of other sources to preach against our agenda. We will adopt the Fairness Doctrine and its more powerful stepchildren. We will use the media as a tool to help affect all the strategies below.

Entertainment:

Controlling the entertainment industry is critical. We will erode and then destroy all forms of restraint, such as codes for “decency” related to sex and violence. We will help create and promote shows, especially aimed at young people, which attack traditional values and institutions. We will expose the evils of parents, police, clergy, and other authority figures while extolling the virtues of casual sex, teen pregnancy, abortion, underage drinking, and drug use.

Religion:

Secularism is the only real religion. Organized, traditional religion must be destroyed. We will drive religion from all aspects of American life. We will vilify religious leaders and religious followers. We will pass laws that erode the first amendment. We will preach fairness to all people, while we marginalize religious people. We will promote Atheism as the only rational and acceptable belief system. We will pass laws to protect the rights of Satanists, pagans, witches, vampires, and other forms of legitimate expression. We will promote the LGBT agenda as a religion, and we will regard any disagreement with it as a blatant form of religious repression that will be punished.

We will aggressively enforce and expand the separation of church and state. We will attack any politician who expresses any form of belief in Judeo-Christian teaching unless she or he is a Progressive and is using such belief to advance the Progressive Agenda. We will rely on the ACLU to continue to remove crosses, the 10 commandments, religious music, and religious displays from the public square. We will continue the war on Christmas and the campaign to expose the evils of Christianity.

We will force all religious institutions to comply with all federal regulations. There will be no exclusions or waivers based on religious beliefs. We will remove the tax exemptions now provided to places of worship and religious institutions.

Education:

We will take over K — 12 education. We will drive out all vestiges of prayer or religious observance, whether in the classroom, assemblies, or graduation ceremonies. We will fire religious teachers. We will ban any use of the bible or other religious books. Our textbooks will be chosen based on how aggressively they promote the Progressive Agenda. We will ignore U.S. history and civics, except for Slavery and Community Organizing. We will teach kids that they are victims of a repressive America and that they need to elect Progressive politicians who will provide for their material and emotional needs.

We will hold back high achievers because they represent inequality. We will make sure all kids pass and get good grades. We will teach less math, reading, and science because America must not be able to maintain an unfair advantage over the third world countries it has suppressed. We will promote cooking and nurturing for boys and medicine and decision making for girls. We will concentrate on racism, sexism, homophobia, environmentalism, and America’s leading role in destroying the earth and its people. We will stop teaching children to think on their own; rather, we will teach them to believe only in the Progressive Agenda and to enjoy the outcomes it bestows on them.

We will support only public schools. We will increase salaries and benefits for public school teachers and administrators, recognizing that a significant percentage of this spending returns to Progressive lawmakers in the form of campaign contributions. We will demonize and aggressively attack school choice, charters, homeschooling, and all other forms of “reform,” as these models siphon money and students from the public schools, our primary vehicles for educating children on the values and superiority of the Progressive Agenda.

Colleges:

We will ensure 95%+ of all professors and administrators are Progressives. We will promote diversity in all aspects of higher education except politics and religion. We will promote more aggressive and militant forms of curricula based on sexism, racism, socialism, and environmentalism that we started in K-12. All college students will learn the evils of global warming, the superiority of women, the wholesomeness of the LGBT agenda, the merits of Socialism over capitalism, the evils of business and free enterprise, and the supremacy of the State over the individual. We will enforce strict speech codes to ensure that those who disagree with the Progressive Agenda or challenge it in any way, are removed from the college community. We will make education free for all, and we will forgive all student indebtedness except for those graduates pursuing a business, religious or military career.

Unions:

We will pass laws that make unionization easier, and we will dramatically curtail the power of management and corporations. We will award all government contacts to union shops, and we will pay a higher prevailing wage for all government contracts. We will pass “Card Check” so that secret ballots do not interfere with unionization efforts. We will turn back so-called “right to work” efforts. We will give no federal contracts to businesses that operate in “right to work” states, nor will a government-sponsored convention ever be held in such a state. We will militantly fight back any effort to reduce the power, pay, or benefits of public unions. Progressive politicians will continue to pass union-friendly legislation and award lucrative union contracts, while public unions will continue to show their appreciation to these politicians with generous campaign contributions and “get out the vote” mobilizations. ACORN will be fully funded by the government. In government-led bankruptcy proceedings, unions will continue to leapfrog legitimate creditors and, like in GM and Chrysler, be given major equity positions in the companies. The government and the media will continue to ignore any charges of bribery, paybacks, financial malfeasance, voter fraud, or voter intimidation involving any union management or rank and file.

We will aggressively support public school unions. We will defeat any attempts at “reform,” including those involving tenure, teacher evaluations, school evaluation, merit pay, and seniority. We must maintain the synergistic relationship between support for the public schools and campaign contributions for Progressive politicians.

Race:

We will continue to position ourselves as the only leaders that can logically represent the interests of African American, Latinos, and other racial and ethnic minorities. We will continue to preach that any form of inequality -- in standards of living, housing, wealth, pay, educational attainment, test scores, health, imprisonment, and so forth -- is the direct result of white racism. We will continue to pass favorable legislation related to lending, pay, hiring, promotions, housing, school admissions, and proportionate representation in all organizations and institutions. We will aggressively promote legislation regarding reparations, quotas, and disparate impact.

We will continue to condemn the innate racism of the police and the justice system. We will attack any discussion of personal responsibility and poor lifestyle choices as racist. We will continue to hold back white student performance and promote white single motherhood in order to achieve racial equality. We will continue to present government as the remedy for minority victimization, and we will continue to enjoy the overwhelming support of minority voters.

Gender:

We will continue to make abortion on demand legal for the full nine months of pregnancy. We will make all abortions free. We will force all insurance companies, if any remain in operation after we enact a full government takeover of the healthcare industry, to provide free abortions and contraceptives to all women. We will allow no waiver to any religious institution trying to avoid paying for abortions by using phony “religious freedom” or “conscience” objections. We will continue to focus on the victimization of and harm done to women by marriage and all other institutions. The media will continue to educate our society on the unending epidemic of violence against women and the LGBT community. We will focus on the lack of achievement of women and the glass ceiling that holds all women back. We will promote the sexual freedom of women, but we will continue to condemn businessmen and politicians who have sex with female coworkers, even when consensual, except if the man is a Progressive and a vocal advocate for unrestricted abortion.

Marriage:

We will attack marriage from all directions. We will depict marriage as an institution that enslaves women and makes them the sexual property of men. We will depict fathers as wife beaters and child abusers. We will promote single motherhood, and we will provide mothers with the resources that fathers traditionally have provided. We will pay for all abortions and provide free full-day daycare. We will legalize gay marriage and will condemn any public utterance that there is any difference between having a mother and a father vs. two fathers or two mothers. Any business or other organization that does not support gay marriage will be put out of operation. The support of our Media, Schools, Colleges, Courts and other strategies will be critically important in this attack on marriage.

Family:

The traditional family is a menace that threatens the Progressive Agenda. We cannot tolerate the existence of a social unit that promotes self-reliance and provides for the caring, growth and well-being of its members, as these responsibilities belong to the State and only the State. We will depict families as dysfunctional sources of pain and abuse. Culturally, we will promote activities and images that lead family members to spend time alone and away from each other. We will continue to promote policies that hinder the creation of traditional black families, and we will seek to bring single motherhood in white families up to the same percentage as that in minority families.

Government Spending:

We will spend more and more on social programs, especially welfare, health and reproductive services, public education, green technologies, and public infrastructure. We will continue to cut defense to below European levels, as the military has been an enabler of American aggression and imperialism. We will ignore the alarmists who decry yearly, trillion-dollar spending deficits. We will not reduce spending on Social Security, Medicaid , and Medicare, and when politically expedient, we will promise to increase spending on these programs. As always, we will accuse the Right of wanting to cut these programs because of their utter disregard for the poor and their slavish devotion to wealth creation for the rich. We will nationalize all facets of healthcare, making it free for all citizens except the wealthy who will pay sizeable tax premiums for their mandatory, single-payer government coverage.

We will ignore calls to reduce the build-up of long-term deficits. We know these debts will never be paid back, to either foreign or domestic holders of our national debt. One of the benefits of this indebtedness is that it will continue to provide a convenient rationale for higher taxation. More importantly, it will eventually topple our financial foundation. It will create both global economic chaos and huge defense vulnerabilities, two calamities from which a weakened America will not recover. These are key milestones on the path to Killing America.

Government Policy:

Government Policy will aim at destroying capitalism and free enterprise. We will attack and destroy the private sector. We will depict all private industry as an evil, uncaring, ineffective, corrupt, and rapacious. We will focus first on healthcare, oil, pharmaceuticals, banking, and insurance.

We will nationalize these one by one. At first, we will be careful not to interfere with those industries that philosophically and economically support our Progressive Agenda. These include media, entertainment, legal, and high tech -- though these industries in Phase 3 will be taken over as well.

We will continue to use the scare of global warming to effect huge shifts of capital from the private sector to the State. We will prop up green industries with tax incentives and mandates regarding the usage of renewable energy. We will award our financial supporters with guaranteed loans and grants. We will use the EPA to impose regulations, fees, and taxes that will make carbon-intensive producers unprofitable. We will prohibit domestic exploration and production. All of this will produce enormous new income streams for Progressive politicians and our new industrial partners. These new industries will have State leadership, management, and ownership, though we will need to make this opaque in the beginning. We will weaken traditional industries, put hostile companies out of business, create green jobs with which to reward our friends, and create widespread economic turmoil and high unemployment. These events, in turn, will provide ammunition for class warfare and cause higher demands for yet more State intervention.

Taxation:

Radical wealth redistribution will be the hallmark of our system of taxation. We will ensure a majority of our citizens pay no income tax. To do this, we will rely on high unemployment, low wages, the manipulation of tax rates, or all three. This will create a reliable voting block that will keep Progressives in office while forcing the wealthy to pay their fair share. We will use class warfare to keep this majority of citizens angry and volatile, and we will direct their anger at the wealthy. We will avoid stating what we believe the top income tax rate should be, but initially, we will restore the 70% level from the pre-Reagan era , and then we will move higher.

We will phase out all deductions for state and local taxes, mortgage payments, and charitable contributions. We will demonize charitable organizations, for they usurp the role of the State in providing what citizens need. We will use our media allies to help us equate paying taxes to helping the needy. We will demonize those who give to charity as being selfish and only wanting the charitable deduction. We will equate giving to the State with the Judeo-Christian message of giving to the poor, even invoking the gospels where beneficial.

Politics:

We will continue to attack our rivals without mercy. We will denigrate them personally, investigate every aspect of their lives, threaten their families and friends, smear them at every turn, and fabricate harmful “facts” when we must. We will not work with them or seek a middle ground.

Politics may have once been “the art of compromise” — but no longer.

We will ensure all immigrants, legal and illegal, have the right to vote. We will attack as racist any attempt to impose voter identification schemes or inspect voter registration rolls. We will suppress the military vote and use absentee votes to increase our ranks. We will register felons and prisoners. We will hire ACORN and public union members to mobilize voter registration and turnout.

Workplace:

We will continue to impose new regulations and aggressively enforce existing ones. We will use disparate impact in all hiring and promotions, and we will enforce gender and sexual-preference quotas at every level. We will forcibly remove white males from leadership positions, especially at the upper management and board levels, as a means to address past racism. As with colleges, we will impose diversity mandates across the entire workforce except as they relate to conservative politics and traditional religions.

Courts:

We will erode the U.S. constitution by enshrining rights that are not stated in the document and abrogating those that are. The Supreme Court and lower courts will increasingly include international laws in their opinions. We will impose a living constitution on America. We will fully cooperate with the United Nations, which will be our primary partner related to international law, global economics, treaties, and international affairs. We will elect and appoint Progressive judges who will militantly rule from the bench and ensure that each strategy of the Progressive Agenda is enforced.

Related to the College strategy, we must continue to ensure that all U.S. law schools are seedbeds of radical Progressive thought. It is within these schools that 95%+ of presidents, legislators, and judges will hone their Progressive thinking and jurisprudence.

Separation of Powers:

The White House, Congress and the judiciary will no longer be “separate but equal.” No more “checks and balances.” The three branches will work closely together to advance the Progressive Agenda. We will elect emotive and charismatic presidents who can articulate the Progressive Agenda convincingly. The President will surround him or herself with unelected czars who will sidestep the typical congressional approval processes and serve as militant policy creators and enforcers. The President will no longer enforce laws that are contrary to Progressive thought. Legislators will draft laws in accordance with Progressive objectives. The judiciary will overturn any law passed that does not comport with the Progressive Agenda.

Conclusion and Call to Action:

The time is now. The Progressive Agenda is real, and our seventeen Progressive Playbook strategies have already proven to be enormously effective. We made huge advances in the 1960s. We kept hope alive through 2008, by which time we had seized the White House and both houses of Congress! We will do so again in 2012. Four more years will allow us to hasten our progress toward the ultimate goal: Killing America!

Taste of Tyranny and Anarchy

Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)

Foreword

It is not enough in a situation of trust in the commonwealth, that a man means well to his country; it is not enough that in his single person he never did an evil act, but always voted according to his conscience, and even harangued against every design which he apprehended to be prejudicial to the interests of his country. This innoxious and ineffectual character, that seems formed upon a plan of apology and disculpation, falls miserably short of the mark of public duty. That duty demands and requires, that what is right should not only be made known but made prevalent; that what is evil should not only be detected but defeated. When the public man omits to put himself in a situation of doing his duty with effect, it is an omission that frustrates the purposes of his trust almost as much as if he had formally betrayed it. It is surely no very rational account of a man's life, that he has always acted right; but has taken special care, to act in such a manner that his endeavors could not possibly be productive of any consequence.

Edmond Burke - Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents” (1770)

Introduction

Tyranny and anarchy abound, rose-colored glasses no longer work. For those who believe the pendulum is swinging and worry not, please open your mind. You have free will, just reject this paper or read it and decide. To protect the innocent, there are code words and terms throughout this text. Here goes my “hot button” topics in this COVID rage age of 2020 that I would like to indulge the reader.

Big Bad Businesses 

It is curious how certain issues swap sides. In the case of big businesses, I have engaged in a long-standing discussion with a Political Correct (PC) person about their big business concerns. The argument goes like this. Big businesses are corrupt entities stomping on the rights of the people. Big government is there to serve and fix the ills of society.

Enter Covid-1984. The hate big business crowd (Marxists) are now happy with big businesses including the mainstream media. The media pushes the Marxist narrative and the big businesses funnel massive amounts of money to the cause. Therefore, the New Political Organ (NPO) has an unlimited pool of funds to push its agenda. The newscast and entertainment psychological caldron project a constant mind-numbing narrative promoting the NPO. Indeed, the NPO may seem to be all about parity. But just go to the NPO’s home page to see their very own Marxist planks.

It is easy to see why the Marist now like big businesses as they get the big money. Of course, businesses that do not promote the narrative face the cancel culture. Meanwhile, big pharma will reap the rewards to produce that “safe and effective” Covid-1984 vaccine. Once we all get the needle plunged in our arm, Bill and Anthony will then cancel the new normal.

Here is the final but overarching point for this section. As we all know, Covid-1984 must have intelligence. It avoided big box stores and targeted small businesses.

Cancel Culture

A new phenomenon in warp drive is the withdrawal of support for companies or public figures after they have done or said something against the Political Correctness Religion (PCR). Mostly occurring on social media, the “Cancel Culture” is a form of group shaming. The mainstream plays along well. We are familiar with the inane canceling of band name icons such as a certain pancake mix, rice, and ice cream bars. Names worth mentioning include Dixie Chicks and Washington Redskins.

As illustrated above, the despicable element is the tagging of products or services that have had no basis or intent on being against the PCR. From the crowd that touts forgiveness, no such thing – targets get no second chance. Canceling has gone toxic and too far. It rejects anyone you disagreed with or someone who did something you did not like. No discussion, I tried it during a lengthy exchange with a PC person. Upon the suggestion we end in gentleman agreement to agree to disagree, my PC friend refused. So much for being all-inclusive from the all-inclusive crowd.

J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter fame) is a nifty example of cancel culture (she is even a PC type). On June 6, Rowling retweeted an op-ed piece that discussed “people who menstruate,” apparently taking issue with the fact that the story did not use the word women. “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure they're used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?,” she wrote.

The small number of people who delight in cancel culture can ruin lives over mistakes made many years ago. Worse yet, using what was acceptable to say 30 years ago (e.g., no women in combat) is now a PC weapon. Therefore, all it takes is a PC terrorist or Marxist to dig up that info to sham a person.

The “mostly peaceful protests” of 2020 make up the cancel culture on steroids. The terror mobs display a religious ecstasy as they demolish historic statues on public property. It is all about canceling history. Lenin would be proud.

Careful cyber friends. When people voice or post something considered anti-PCR, lookout. They get doxed whereby an online vigilante will research and post confidential information. There are instances where the vigilante posted the wrong person’s information. Also, consider the vile outcomes from misrepresented content.

With so much zeal on using the long past to cancel, an item needs attention. The cancel culture needs to do their thing against the political party that one-time promoted slavery. Any guesses which party?

Churches Charred 

A series of arson and vandalism attacks have occurred at Catholic Churches, and others, across North America. The mainstream media’s failure to report the attacks proves a double standard of newsworthiness when intolerance targets Christians. Friends this is getting serious. Remember, Marxism hates religion. As reference:

“This map (click here) tracks incidents of attacks on Catholic statues, parishes, and persons in North America in 2020. Thanks to your help, we have recorded over 50 incidents thus far this year. Click on one of the icons on the map to see the details for each incident.”

We all know about hate crime statutes. The mainstream goes into warp drive when other than Christian worship centers suffer an attack. Did the mainstem call for hate crimes investigation for any of the 50 “mostly peaceful protests?” Too often we become complacent as we hear about these incidents but not affected directly. I personally know a parishioner of one the church attacked. This church suffered a fire during the attack.

Covid Case Craziness 

Enter the hospital for a knee replacement you will meet the COVID police. You will be subject to COVID testing. Even with no symptoms, for a positive result the hospital will tag you a COVID-1984 patient case. Is there an incentive? You bet. There are plenty of reliable reports pointing to government monetary incentive – hospital grant money for cases. I despise that “c” word these days. No wonder the scary case craze and never-ending health fear porn abounds – rising cases. Meanwhile, the total number of COVD deaths projected on the boob tube is the aggregate of those who “died of” and “died with.” The bigger number gets the news headline (money).

Covid is not a hoax. However, it is the prime example of the Hegelian dialectic. The thesis = it is a hoax. The antithesis = we are all going to die. The synthesis = the perfect tool for the COVID 19 New World Order.

For those who still think for themselves under this the new normal, the word vaccine triggers a response. We hear about “operation warp speed,” see the global vaccine czar Bil Gates tout immunization for the world population, and enlightening beams of Dr. Fauchi pouring out of the TV with his positive vaccine pitch. The Covid-1984 RNA vaccine under development is a completely new type of therapy never used on humans. It takes many years to develop and test a vaccine, so no wonder the concerns. I sure cogitate why the mainstream will not call this vaccine controversial. That is a huge matzo ball.

Maybe we will get lucky; the experts will find out the vaccine will be not so critical like the ventilators manufactured (e.g. Ford Motor Company) never used. Maybe it will simply be the realization of herd immunity or a discovery of a simple therapy already on hand. It is incomprehensible with all the political intrigue surrounding Covid therapies, but money explains that part of the story.

It is increasingly clear that the pandemic new normal procedures are causing more harm than the disease itself. While easy to partake in Monday morning quarterbacking, IMHO every occupation that puts food on the table is a critical job. Masks (another Hegelian dialectic), social distance, hand washing, no shutdowns, and quarantine the vulnerable would have made sense. But no, we all suffer.

Seems the newscast a death sentence spell on anybody who gets Covid! Get ready for a CovidPass app on your phones. Submit a blood sample to get your digital certification to travel, go to sports events, etc. I loathe the new normal.

Demonic Distress

Look at the faces and listen to the hellish sound coming out of the protesters. It is clear a lot of people suffer from possession. It is more than coincidence; years of sexual sins and abortion coincide with the now acidic society. One plausible explanation; each abortion releases a demon. People screaming “racist!” at non-racists is a demonic form of insanity. Such an exchange without evidence and without honest discussion is a form of demonic disorientation.

A lot of people use the F word in everyday conversation and it repulsive at worst and irritating at best. The constant use of this word as a simple sound is an uncontrollable speech tic. We expect this from the possessed flock, and it is time for the unpossessed to get rid of this uncontrollable tic.

Hyper Hypocrisy 

We know intuitively that schools and academia have conditioned students to be Marxists. Reports show many of the “mostly peaceful protesters” are schoolteachers. Quite the thing in hypocrisy studies. Well-paid teaches and professors push the Marxist equality plan. Under their communism, we will all be equal in the true sense of equally miserable. But like Animal Farm, we must look the other way as our leaders will remain comfortable.

The multitudes just love professional sports players. Once upon of time, it was quite a spectacle to see the PC crowd attend sports events. They do not like rich people. Never mind the players, who also promote the Marxist narrative, get obscene amounts of money to entertain the masses. In the new normal these paragons of virtue play their games in empty stadiums. If not for the average person who works in this business such as vendors, security, and the like it would be nice to see professional sports simply go away.

Mostly Peaceful Protests

The mainstream news has an agenda and for a critical thinker it is clear, a narrative abounds. The programing overlords edit the terribly bad scenes and call the issue “mostly peaceful protests.” The alternate media paints a much darker picture; rioting, looting, burning, and vandalism. The visible tactics and the slogans of the “mostly peaceful protests” supply a terrifying insight to their ideology – Marxism. The good people need to hear this, it is the core of the narrative. This information is critical, and dissemination will never happen in the mainstream. Rest assured any attempt at presenting this critical fact will ignite the mainstream smear machine: just yell racist!

Yes, peaceful protesting is a right. However, a protest marching and chanting in a store or restaurant disrupting peaceful activities, banging on a residence door, or shining laser in the yes of people is anything but peaceful. This mob crowd had the gall to enter a church to do the same thing. There is plenty of this occurring but not reported in the mainstream.

People that have lost their businesses and or livelihood due to the “mostly peaceful protests” sure have a front-line perspective. Has there been any investigative reporting about the plight of these people? Crickets.

Safety and Security Squelched

We all know Antifa is real and an evil menace. Long before the 2020 New Normal, the alternate media documented the evil of this “organization.” This evil has conducted violence in many large cities. It combined with Marxists during virulent riots and vandalism. In Portland, WA this hell mix continued with the violence for wo months (and counting as of this writing). One side of Congress refuses to admit there is terror unfolding before our eyes. One congressman (initials J.N.) contends that Antifa is a myth (not).

When citizens step up to defend themselves from this evil, the mainstream turns to the narrative. They will smear the defenders as violent, right-wing Nazi, etc.  The mob even had the criminal justice system on their side. In one case, a couple defending their home and lives from a mob (not a shot fired), faced weapons violations. Luckily, this couple had their charges dismissed. Meanwhile, in several cities, the mob get their charges dropped for their actual crimes.

Defend the police mantra is the ultimate insult. It is a betrayal by the local lawmakers who are working to remove the safety net from society. It is unthinkable that to support the local police can be dangerous. It is quite the thing to hear a news report where the mob calls the police when they need help. Rest assured the Marxist “law” makers pushing this demonic program will have their own security force.

So, what replaces the Police? In one example, the Seattle City Council is moving to abolish the entire Seattle Police Department and replace it with a “civilian-led Department of Community Safety & Violence Prevention.” This plan demands that the City transfer underutilized public land for community ownership. This is the redistribution of land, a Marxist program. This is what we get for a couple bad cops out of millions.

The Recap

This writer will avoid political endorsements. For the Anti-Orange Man types, I can understand the reason for the hatred. When a certain president was in office decades ago, I had disdain for the man (for distinct reasons). A good friend who was a senior to me expressed concern that I have become my adversary.  He also said, “there is a bigger picture, and Mr. S you need to grow up.” I have since learned it is all an illusion, hoodwinked we are to think there is an enormous difference between the parties. We do not even pick the candidates. This election, to place the Orange man’s flag on a pole invites vandalism or worse. Sad, we have become a third world nation.

Despite all the rancor and violence, we are all part of the human race. There are only two types of people in IMHO. Nice and not so nice. Heaven please help us we do not get to the point equivalent to the spark of the Spanish Civil War.

Congratulations go to those who read this document and are nowhere. A gold star for good liberals! Marxists are another story.

A Bill of Rights and Power Brakes

Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)

During the hot summer of 1787 in Philadelphia, some of the delegates at the Constitutional convention advocated a list of individual rights within the document they were creating. However, the Convention opposed this idea because they thought that such a list might be subject to abuse. Specifically, they intended to form a new government on the principle that all rights exist with the people who voluntarily grant the Federal government specific powers defined in the Constitution. The Founders wished for a government with powers confined by narrowly defined limits. Congress divided, separated, and balanced powers to prevent tyranny.

James Madison is known as the “Father of the Constitution” and he, along with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, wrote 85 “Federalist Papers.” The Federalist, written and published in the New York press after the Convention (1787-88) made the case to the States to ratify the Constitution. Madison, in Federalist No. 84 wrote “… The Constitution is itself, in every sense, and to every useful purpose, a Bill of Rights.”

Those who advocated a Constitution without a Bill of Rights point to the Preamble which states, “... the People of the United States … secure the Blessings of Liberty ...”  Nevertheless, the Bill of Rights further reflects the Framers belief in the rights of the people. Specifically, Amendments One, Two, Four, Nine, and Ten all invoke “the people.” Amendment Five states, “No person,” and Six “the accused.”

The people against the new Constitution were “Anti-Federalists.” They believed that an overarching Federal government would eventually lead to tyranny and the famous Patrick Henry was among this group. Thomas Jefferson who was in France during the Convention also expressed some reservations about the new Constitution. Henry and Jefferson were among those who advocated the addition of a “Bill of Rights.” Jefferson wrote, “I … hope a bill of rights will be formed, to guard the people against the federal government.” It is important to note that those who advocated a Bill of Rights and those at the Convention both wanted to guard the people against the government.

The delegates signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787, without a Bill of Rights.  The Constitution became law September 13, 1788, as this is the date that the required ninth State accepted it.  While the Constitution originally did not have a Bill of Rights, the Framers cooperated in the development of such a list and they made it one of their first tasks in the new Congress. It was not until 1791 that Congress adopted the Bill of Rights and the remaining States each accepted (ratified) the Constitution.

One proposal was for the new Congress to enact a statute, rather than amendments to the Constitution. However, there was a concern that a future Congress may repeal such a statute. Under the leadership of Alexander Hamilton, there were 200 proposals on basic rights gathered from the states. This list narrowed down to 12 then 10. On December 15, 1791, Congress ratified the Bill of Rights as the first ten Amendments to the Constitution.

While we refer to these Amendments as the Bill of Rights, some scholars rightfully claim these to be “brakes” on the power of the Federal Government. For handy reference, the following are the Ten Amendments (emphasis added):

1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
2. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
3. No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
4. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
5. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise, infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
6. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
7. In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, then according to the rules of the common law.
8. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
10. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The following quote nicely summarizes the principles behind the Bill of Rights:

History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people, against invasion by the Federal Government. — Bell v. Hood, 71 F. Supp., 813, 816 (1947) U.S.D.C., So. Dist. CA.

Today, it seems the phrase “the people” (Amendments One, Two, Four, Nine, and Ten), “No person” (Amendment Five), and “the accused” (Amendment Six) each means something entirely different to certain people.  Is this an anomaly or is it modernist planned confusion?

Kinky Kinsey

Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)

This paper, originally written by this author in 2004, includes weblink updates and some new information. It solidifies the dangers exposed by Dr. Judith Reisman’s research.

August 24, 1953, edition of Time Magazine described Alfred Kinsey as “a friendly man with a passionate interest in people.” Time also said that Kinsey “has become almost a recluse. He sees less and less of his old faculty friends, though most of them still like him.” Time also claimed that actor and writer Cornelia Otis Skinner was a part of Kinsey’s “female sample.” She said that Kinsey “has the skill of a great actor in drawing you into what he is doing.” Kinsey died in 1956.

The Kinsey Institute lives on under the guise of legitimate science at Indiana University despite the torrid details. The seminal works of Kinsey include Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). It is no mere coincidence that this “scientific” work preceded the sexual revolution of the 1960s. So, what were the experiments? How about human research conducted by pedophiles on thousands of children. Dr. Judith Reisman first reported this information in a 1981 paper delivered to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality. Her report also shows that Kinsey supports the contention that sexual activity in children is natural and healthy. In 1997, a Kinsey biographer admitted that “the father of the sexual revolution” was not a conventional academic and family-oriented person. Working at Indiana University he was in fact a sexual deviant.

Kinsey wanted people to be free from sexual restraints. To this author, here we have the key point, as this is where the liberators have their hook. Those considered “conservative” or worse yet "Christian fundamentalists" face the smear tactics. The liberators feel it is important to remove any restraints on people. Consequences include sexuality-transmuted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and a breakdown in the family unit.

Now back to Kinsey the pervert. His reports claimed to have “proved” that 95% of American men were sex offenders. This “sound” analysis and research gave birth to the new field of study called “sexology.” This worked to change American law, medicine, and education. As courtrooms, classrooms, and bedrooms adopted Kinsey's research, society suffers.

One of the more disturbing items noted by Dr. Reisman is the fact that the North American Man-Boy Love Association praises Kinsey. She also finds that his work is the basis for lax laws and cultural norms, which has helped to foster a sharp rise in sex crimes against children. The FBI recorded 58,200 abductions by non-family members in 1999, most of which involved sexual victimization. The liberators will say, “there is no link as it’s all about the terrible rises in population and there are too many people.” This is nothing more than pure bunk and hogwash. Period.

In 1964, sex education began in earnest in the schools when the Kinsey Institute founded the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS). The SIECUS program, which is active today, rests on The Kinsey Reports (1948-1953) whose male sample is 87% aberrant consisting of convicts, and others outside mainstream society. Kinsey collaborated with pedophiles, which conducted human experiments by abusing infants and children. Kinsey claimed that this experimentation (read abuse) proved that people have sexual ability and desire from birth. Therefore, SIECUS begins teaching about all types of sexual issues beginning with early childhood.

It gets worse my dear friends. Our friends at SIECUS in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control, the National School Boards Association, Planned Parenthood, and others have recently developed new “Guidelines for Comprehensive Sex Education.” For ages 12 to 15 it says that “a few boys engage in a very dangerous and sometimes fatal form of masturbation that involves limiting their air supply,” and for ages 9 to 12 that “homosexual love relationships can be as satisfying as heterosexual relationships.” For ages 5 to 8, “touching or rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.” Oh, how wonderful.

The adage goes that “knowledge is power” and it is obvious that some individuals and groups don’t want parents to have that power over their children. It is proper to ask why the “system” in modern times must teach all types of sexual practices. Why is it so important for teachers, driven by innocuous groups like SIECUS, to inculcate the incredibly young children? What is most disturbing is the fact that the sexual practices now taught to our young children were appalling to the past generations. Pedophilia is a crime and be aware of changes hidden in plain sight. See “It’s Not the Equality Act, It’s The Pedophile Protection Act” and “TEDx says Pedophilia is an Unchangeable Orientation.”

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is another concern. It continues to funnel taxpayer monies to fund sex studies at the Kinsey Institute as evidenced by a $26,000 grant for a July 2003 conference that included discussion about “… the relationship ... between sexual motivation and arousal,” plus “guidelines for ... measurement of sexual response …” One of the wonderful (sic.) speakers at the Kinsey conference was Northwestern University psychology professor J. Michael Bailey. [1] Our illustrious friends at the NIH had supplied Bailey a $147,000 grant. The program - pay women to view pornography while using an instrument called a “plethysmograph.” So, what was the goal of this study? To measure the sexual responses of the women watching the porno flicks. I’m sure that Penthouse magazine et. al. would love to get a piece of that action. For 2004 how about these choice programs:

• Sexual habits of older men at the New England Research Institutes Inc. - $69,000.
• Drug use and HIV-related behavior by San Francisco’s Asian prostitutes/masseuses at the University of California-San-Francisco - $641,000.
• American Indian and Alaskan Native lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, and “two-spirited individuals (whatever that means) - $500,000. 

My, oh my, how many people would feel about their taxpayer monies going to these nice programs. Mainstream media establishment programmers never mentioned these sex programs. One the other hand, the news gets pumped up over the most obscure “news” about those “terrible Christian religious fanatics” that pose a threat. Other religious fanatics of other denominations are exempt. [2]

It is also important to note that in 1995, Congress drafted a bill called the “Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act.” This bill, if passed, was to mandate that Congress investigate Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Male and/or Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. As Congress debated this bill, Indiana University almost closed the door of its campus guest, the Kinsey Institute. That was short-lived. The subversive foundations, Ford and Rockefeller, stepped in to provide funding to allow the kinky sex studies to continue unabated.

While not passed, the 1995 bill spurred interest outside the United States. A British documentary called “Secret History: Kinsey’s Pedophiles” exposed the lurid details. England broadcast the documentary on August 10, 1998. This film exposed the information contained in this paper and more.

In 2003, Hollywood produced a film called “Kinsey” that glorifies the work of the good (sic) “doctor.”  Meanwhile, it omitted the detestable elements. Reports claim that the web page of the North American Man-Boy Love Association calls Kinsey its hero “in the struggle we fight today.” [3]

As we know, it is typical that those who have a so-called “liberal” agenda will thwart dialogue and debate. This is censorship of an overt nature by ignoring the facts. Bernie Goldberg in his book “Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News” and Tammy Bruce in her book “The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds” and other liberals have had the courage to speak out against this censorship. We need more good liberals to come out and break the silence about the sinister nature of this type of censorship. The silence of our mainstream media speaks volumes of the censorship of sex-education. It is sodomy/debauchery education of our children. This is an un-American activity and as such:

• College students now enroll in official classes that study pornographic films. 
• Sex change operations are common to such a degree that a convicted criminal can demand that government pay his sex-change operation.
• The American Psychiatric Association in 1973 dropping homosexuality as a disorder and more recently considering removing adult-child sex.

Every indicator of sexual misbehavior has soared in the 50 years since the Kinsey “studies.”
As the cultural elitists debase Christian values, the sexologists along with their collaborators the postmodern secular humanists, propagate moral relativism. The media and teachers will follow suit and do the same. These words have no meaning to some of our liberal friends.

1. Bailey’s latest book “The Man Who Would Be Queen” studies homosexuality and other aspects of sexual identity. At the July 2003 conference, he took part in a panel about “Gender, Age & Sexual Orientation” at the July 2003 conference.
2. For example, the June 30, 2003 edition of Time Magazine was about Christians preaching in Muslim nations. Time is so concerned by this activity that its worries are best summed up by their statement: “Growing numbers of Evangelicals are trying to spread Christianity in Muslim lands. But is this what the world needs now?”
3. Congress Should Probe and Defund the Kinseyites by Dr. Judith Reisman, Ph.D.; Human Events, October 20, 2003.

Nauseating NEA

Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)

People exposed to the public education system see a deplorable almost indescribable situation. Horror stories abound. Even those who do not have children in the public schools know of the trouble in our learning (cough cough) centers. Falling grades and the violence committed by the darlings tell the story. Sad to say, even many of the private schools have the infection - radical egalitarian philosophies. To hide the facts, the Marxists in control of the school system insist that things are “acceptable,” and more money will make things “better.” The reality – the money goes up academia goes down.

A century ago, schools were doing well, virtually all students graduated literate. Today, the literacy rate has plummeted and even those who now graduate would have failed in the good old days. The deplorable condition of our schools is not just about enough money to instruct the students. It is about power and manipulation. So, when did our ride down the well-lubricated sliding board start?  Stay tuned for a wild ride.

All ahead slow and steady, hidden in plain sight, with the principal culprit being non-other than the National Education Association (NEA). Birthed in 1857 as the National Teachers Association in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, it later became the NEA.  It joined ranks with the National Association of School Superintendents and the American Normal School Association. Today, the NEA is the largest teacher’s union in the nation and in some areas, it has a virtual monopoly on representation.  In 1908, the NEA accomplice John Dewey wrote:

“Our schools ... are performing an infinitely significant religious work. They are promoting the social unity out of which in the end genuine religious unity must grow. ...dogmatic beliefs... we see.. disappearing... It is the part of men to... work for the transformation of all practical instrumentalities of education till they are in harmony with these ideas.”

In 1916, Dewey was recognized as the leader of the “progressive educators” and he wrote:

“There is always a danger that increased personal independence will decrease the social capacity of an individual... It often makes an individual so insensitive in his relations to others as to develop an illusion of being really able to stand and act alone--an unnamed form of insanity which is responsible for a large part of the remedial suffering of the world.”

In 1932, the NEA named Dewey their honorary president. In 1933, he co-authored the first Humanist Manifesto, which called for “synthesizing of all religions and a socialized and cooperative economic order.” By the 1950’s, the “progressive” educators had infiltrated the ranks at education colleges.  They occupied the offices of school superintendents and principals. In the 1952 Congressional Record, Senator William Jenners wrote:

“This war against our Constitution ... is being fought here... in our schools... colleges... churches... women’s clubs. It is being fought with our money, channeled through the State Department. It is being fought 24 hours a day.... while we remain asleep.... The United Nations is at work... every day and night, changing the teachers, changing the teaching materials, changing the very words and tones--changing all the essential ideas which we imagine our schools are teaching to our young folks.”

So, what are some of the tenants of Dewey’s (read NEAs) program? How about students governing themselves and teachers serving as “guides.” If that is not enough, what about declaring that “Scientific study of each pupil’s development, physical, mental, social and spiritual, is absolutely essential to the intelligent direction of his development.” Today it includes sexual education. Let us call it what that is: indoctrination into deviant sexual behavior for the darlings in grade school. This is not a joke, keep on reading my friends. 

At NEA’s 1935 annual meeting, Willard Givens declared:

“...many drastic changes must be made …. a dying ‘laissez-faire’ must be completely destroyed and all of us, including the ‘owners,’ must be subjected to a large degree of social control.... The major function of the school is the social orientation of the individual. It must seek to give him understanding of the transition to a new social order.”

There it is - schools are to no longer focus on the education of students but to socialize them. Affirming this concept in 1953 was the Dewey disciple B.F. Skinner in his treatise Science and Human Behavior wrote: “…. Operant conditioning shapes behavior as a sculptor shapes a lump of clay.” Sounds like the practitioners of the “living breathing constitution” have taken some clues from the Skinner playbook.

It is important to note that the NEA has an infatuation with the United Nations (UN) and their educational (cough cough) organ, the United Nations Education and Scientific Organization (UNECSO). To wit, in 1946 NEA gushed that UNESCO was “the culmination of a movement for the creation of an international agency of education… each member nation... has a duty to see to it that nothing in its curriculum... is contrary to UNESCO's aims.” The report “Education for International Understanding in American Schools” published in 1948 stated “The idea has become established that the preservation of international peace and order may require that force be used to compel a nation to conduct its affairs within the framework of an established world system. The most modern expression of this doctrine and collective security in the United Nations Charter.” This beat goes on, as the NEA says nothing of the precepts contained in our founding documents such as the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. For proof in the pudding, this author recommends a tour of the NEA website at www.nea.org. How is that for a warm and fuzzy?

In 1956, Dr. Counts organized educators to study changes to the curricula, textbooks, etc. through the Commission on Social Studies of the American Historical Association. In 1958 this “commission” recommended that “... separate courses in history, economics, civics, and geography be abandoned - or, rather, all combined into one course to be called ‘social studies,’ with emphasis on ‘social’ or ‘conflict of masses’ ideas. ... Cumulative evidence supports the conclusion, that, in the United States as in other countries, the age of individualism and laissez-faire in economy and government is closing and that a new age of collectivism is emerging …” Does this sound familiar?

Chester Pierce, Professor of Education and Psychiatry at Harvard, told the Association for Childhood Education International in 1970 that “every child in American entering schools at the age of five is insane because he comes to schools with certain allegiances toward our founding father, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity...” The operative word is “insane” but this is good food for the NEA.

No conspiracy here, it is all out in plain sight for those who are no longer looking through rose-colored spectacles. Trust in God, family, and limited government (in that order) no more and replaced by the Dewey/Skinner/NEA creed. Schools receiving government money may not mention God in a Judeo-Christian context. The ever-powerful leviathan government and it's surrogate the educational (cough cough) system, with NEA operatives, has become the new parents for the children. It is quite brilliant, the NEA with its allies such as the Supreme Court have all done an admirable (cough cough) job. They make the students illiterate and morally fuzzy. There is no other explanation as it fits the agenda as there is ever more money for increasing programs. Thus, NEA will pretend to repair their created problems. The desired result; more teachers, money, bureaucrats, control, and power.

Has this system been successful in eradicating religion from the schools? Nope. With traditional Christianity virtually extinct, we find a homogenized pseudo-religion. This includes new age thinking, myths, symbols, and earth worship (climate change). The NEA and its willing partners have a zealot attitude about their program. In their warped minds, this pseudo-religion is greater than any mainstream religious order. They want humans to worship their notion of a worldwide socialist governing entity. The NEA is at the forefront for sure.

In the beginning, the NEA advanced the cause of education and professional advancement. The NEA transformed from a home office of federated state educational organizations into a militant union. It now spends the largest part of its resources on political activities. In fact, the NEA is now one of the largest political lobbying organizations. In 1976 NEA president Ryor said his organization is “the foremost political power in the nation.” Duplicitous Demagogues club includes the NEA.  It is an organization that decries the lobbying of big business while promoting its own “political power.”

The only other choice (for lack of a better word) for an educator’s union is the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Not as radical as the NEA, the AFT with its one million members and the NEA with its three million members both tow the Marxist line. Together, they contributed about $32.5 million to the 2016 elections. It is easy to guess who got most of these funds. Democratic Party gets the prize. Remember, businesses that lobby in an analogous manner face demonization by the same ilk that reaps the $32.5 million harvest. Will “campaign finance reform” take care of this problem? Do not look for CNN to expose this fleecing of America.

I feel sorry for the people who believe that the NEA’s most zealot partner, the Democratic Party, is good for the nation. As for the Republican Party, it is as bad but for distinct reasons (e.g., No Child Left Behind).

Is the information in this paper controversial? You bet. The minions of the evil empire, otherwise known as the news and entertainment establishment, will demonize what they do not like. They call it “controversial.” That is right controversial, but the plain truth shows us that it is only a problem for those who do not want the real agenda exposed. The moral of the story - when the establishment calls something controversial it typically is a good thing.

Enter the “mostly peaceful protests” of 2020. A critical thinking person can see the reality of looting and rioting. Young adults show their inculcated ignorance by destroying statues of historical figures that fought for the very thing they clamor about. Secondary education is the pinnacle of Marxist indoctrination. Defund Academia!

The following books were the primary sources for the information in this Paper:

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America: A Chronological Paper Trail
by Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt, 462 pages, 3D Research Co; (September 1999).

Cloning of the American Mind: Eradicating Morality through Education
by B. K. Eakman, 608 pages, Huntington House Pub; (August 1998) 

None Dare Call It Education: What's Happening to Our Schools & Our Children?
by John Stormer, 224 pages, Liberty Bell Press; (October 1998)

The Public Orphanage: How Public Schools Are Usurping Control of Our Children
by Eric Buehrer, 244 pages, Word Publishing; (July 1995)

Inside American Education: The Decline, The Deception, The Dogmas
by Thomas Sowell, 384 pages, Free Press; (September 1992) 

The Worm in the Apple: How the Teacher Unions Are Destroying American Education
by Peter Brimelow, 320 pages, HarperCollins, (February 2003)

Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling

by John Taylor Gatto, 240 pages, New Society Publishers; (April 2010)