Frederick R Smith has moved to Frederick R. Smith Speaks (substack.com)
This paper, originally written by this author in 2004, includes weblink updates and some new information. It solidifies the dangers exposed by Dr. Judith Reisman’s research.
August 24, 1953, edition of Time Magazine described Alfred Kinsey as “a friendly man with a passionate interest in people.” Time also said that Kinsey “has become almost a recluse. He sees less and less of his old faculty friends, though most of them still like him.” Time also claimed that actor and writer Cornelia Otis Skinner was a part of Kinsey’s “female sample.” She said that Kinsey “has the skill of a great actor in drawing you into what he is doing.” Kinsey died in 1956.
The Kinsey Institute lives on under the guise of legitimate science at Indiana University despite the torrid details. The seminal works of Kinsey include Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). It is no mere coincidence that this “scientific” work preceded the sexual revolution of the 1960s. So, what were the experiments? How about human research conducted by pedophiles on thousands of children. Dr. Judith Reisman first reported this information in a 1981 paper delivered to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality. Her report also shows that Kinsey supports the contention that sexual activity in children is natural and healthy. In 1997, a Kinsey biographer admitted that “the father of the sexual revolution” was not a conventional academic and family-oriented person. Working at Indiana University he was in fact a sexual deviant.
Kinsey wanted people to be free from sexual restraints. To this author, here we have the key point, as this is where the liberators have their hook. Those considered “conservative” or worse yet "Christian fundamentalists" face the smear tactics. The liberators feel it is important to remove any restraints on people. Consequences include sexuality-transmuted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and a breakdown in the family unit.
Now back to Kinsey the pervert. His reports claimed to have “proved” that 95% of American men were sex offenders. This “sound” analysis and research gave birth to the new field of study called “sexology.” This worked to change American law, medicine, and education. As courtrooms, classrooms, and bedrooms adopted Kinsey's research, society suffers.
One of the more disturbing items noted by Dr. Reisman is the fact that the North American Man-Boy Love Association praises Kinsey. She also finds that his work is the basis for lax laws and cultural norms, which has helped to foster a sharp rise in sex crimes against children. The FBI recorded 58,200 abductions by non-family members in 1999, most of which involved sexual victimization. The liberators will say, “there is no link as it’s all about the terrible rises in population and there are too many people.” This is nothing more than pure bunk and hogwash. Period.
In 1964, sex education began in earnest in the schools when the Kinsey Institute founded the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS). The SIECUS program, which is active today, rests on The Kinsey Reports (1948-1953) whose male sample is 87% aberrant consisting of convicts, and others outside mainstream society. Kinsey collaborated with pedophiles, which conducted human experiments by abusing infants and children. Kinsey claimed that this experimentation (read abuse) proved that people have sexual ability and desire from birth. Therefore, SIECUS begins teaching about all types of sexual issues beginning with early childhood.
It gets worse my dear friends. Our friends at SIECUS in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control, the National School Boards Association, Planned Parenthood, and others have recently developed new “Guidelines for Comprehensive Sex Education.” For ages 12 to 15 it says that “a few boys engage in a very dangerous and sometimes fatal form of masturbation that involves limiting their air supply,” and for ages 9 to 12 that “homosexual love relationships can be as satisfying as heterosexual relationships.” For ages 5 to 8, “touching or rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.” Oh, how wonderful.
The adage goes that “knowledge is power” and it is obvious that some individuals and groups don’t want parents to have that power over their children. It is proper to ask why the “system” in modern times must teach all types of sexual practices. Why is it so important for teachers, driven by innocuous groups like SIECUS, to inculcate the incredibly young children? What is most disturbing is the fact that the sexual practices now taught to our young children were appalling to the past generations. Pedophilia is a crime and be aware of changes hidden in plain sight. See “It’s Not the Equality Act, It’s The Pedophile Protection Act” and “TEDx says Pedophilia is an Unchangeable Orientation.”
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is another concern. It continues to funnel taxpayer monies to fund sex studies at the Kinsey Institute as evidenced by a $26,000 grant for a July 2003 conference that included discussion about “… the relationship ... between sexual motivation and arousal,” plus “guidelines for ... measurement of sexual response …” One of the wonderful (sic.) speakers at the Kinsey conference was Northwestern University psychology professor J. Michael Bailey. [1] Our illustrious friends at the NIH had supplied Bailey a $147,000 grant. The program - pay women to view pornography while using an instrument called a “plethysmograph.” So, what was the goal of this study? To measure the sexual responses of the women watching the porno flicks. I’m sure that Penthouse magazine et. al. would love to get a piece of that action. For 2004 how about these choice programs:
It is also important to note that in 1995, Congress drafted a bill called the “Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act.” This bill, if passed, was to mandate that Congress investigate Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Male and/or Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. As Congress debated this bill, Indiana University almost closed the door of its campus guest, the Kinsey Institute. That was short-lived. The subversive foundations, Ford and Rockefeller, stepped in to provide funding to allow the kinky sex studies to continue unabated.
While not passed, the 1995 bill spurred interest outside the United States. A British documentary called “Secret History: Kinsey’s Pedophiles” exposed the lurid details. England broadcast the documentary on August 10, 1998. This film exposed the information contained in this paper and more.
In 2003, Hollywood produced a film called “Kinsey” that glorifies the work of the good (sic) “doctor.” Meanwhile, it omitted the detestable elements. Reports claim that the web page of the North American Man-Boy Love Association calls Kinsey its hero “in the struggle we fight today.” [3]
As we know, it is typical that those who have a so-called “liberal” agenda will thwart dialogue and debate. This is censorship of an overt nature by ignoring the facts. Bernie Goldberg in his book “Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News” and Tammy Bruce in her book “The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds” and other liberals have had the courage to speak out against this censorship. We need more good liberals to come out and break the silence about the sinister nature of this type of censorship. The silence of our mainstream media speaks volumes of the censorship of sex-education. It is sodomy/debauchery education of our children. This is an un-American activity and as such:
As the cultural elitists debase Christian values, the sexologists along with their collaborators the postmodern secular humanists, propagate moral relativism. The media and teachers will follow suit and do the same. These words have no meaning to some of our liberal friends.
August 24, 1953, edition of Time Magazine described Alfred Kinsey as “a friendly man with a passionate interest in people.” Time also said that Kinsey “has become almost a recluse. He sees less and less of his old faculty friends, though most of them still like him.” Time also claimed that actor and writer Cornelia Otis Skinner was a part of Kinsey’s “female sample.” She said that Kinsey “has the skill of a great actor in drawing you into what he is doing.” Kinsey died in 1956.
The Kinsey Institute lives on under the guise of legitimate science at Indiana University despite the torrid details. The seminal works of Kinsey include Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). It is no mere coincidence that this “scientific” work preceded the sexual revolution of the 1960s. So, what were the experiments? How about human research conducted by pedophiles on thousands of children. Dr. Judith Reisman first reported this information in a 1981 paper delivered to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality. Her report also shows that Kinsey supports the contention that sexual activity in children is natural and healthy. In 1997, a Kinsey biographer admitted that “the father of the sexual revolution” was not a conventional academic and family-oriented person. Working at Indiana University he was in fact a sexual deviant.
Kinsey wanted people to be free from sexual restraints. To this author, here we have the key point, as this is where the liberators have their hook. Those considered “conservative” or worse yet "Christian fundamentalists" face the smear tactics. The liberators feel it is important to remove any restraints on people. Consequences include sexuality-transmuted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and a breakdown in the family unit.
Now back to Kinsey the pervert. His reports claimed to have “proved” that 95% of American men were sex offenders. This “sound” analysis and research gave birth to the new field of study called “sexology.” This worked to change American law, medicine, and education. As courtrooms, classrooms, and bedrooms adopted Kinsey's research, society suffers.
One of the more disturbing items noted by Dr. Reisman is the fact that the North American Man-Boy Love Association praises Kinsey. She also finds that his work is the basis for lax laws and cultural norms, which has helped to foster a sharp rise in sex crimes against children. The FBI recorded 58,200 abductions by non-family members in 1999, most of which involved sexual victimization. The liberators will say, “there is no link as it’s all about the terrible rises in population and there are too many people.” This is nothing more than pure bunk and hogwash. Period.
In 1964, sex education began in earnest in the schools when the Kinsey Institute founded the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS). The SIECUS program, which is active today, rests on The Kinsey Reports (1948-1953) whose male sample is 87% aberrant consisting of convicts, and others outside mainstream society. Kinsey collaborated with pedophiles, which conducted human experiments by abusing infants and children. Kinsey claimed that this experimentation (read abuse) proved that people have sexual ability and desire from birth. Therefore, SIECUS begins teaching about all types of sexual issues beginning with early childhood.
It gets worse my dear friends. Our friends at SIECUS in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control, the National School Boards Association, Planned Parenthood, and others have recently developed new “Guidelines for Comprehensive Sex Education.” For ages 12 to 15 it says that “a few boys engage in a very dangerous and sometimes fatal form of masturbation that involves limiting their air supply,” and for ages 9 to 12 that “homosexual love relationships can be as satisfying as heterosexual relationships.” For ages 5 to 8, “touching or rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.” Oh, how wonderful.
The adage goes that “knowledge is power” and it is obvious that some individuals and groups don’t want parents to have that power over their children. It is proper to ask why the “system” in modern times must teach all types of sexual practices. Why is it so important for teachers, driven by innocuous groups like SIECUS, to inculcate the incredibly young children? What is most disturbing is the fact that the sexual practices now taught to our young children were appalling to the past generations. Pedophilia is a crime and be aware of changes hidden in plain sight. See “It’s Not the Equality Act, It’s The Pedophile Protection Act” and “TEDx says Pedophilia is an Unchangeable Orientation.”
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is another concern. It continues to funnel taxpayer monies to fund sex studies at the Kinsey Institute as evidenced by a $26,000 grant for a July 2003 conference that included discussion about “… the relationship ... between sexual motivation and arousal,” plus “guidelines for ... measurement of sexual response …” One of the wonderful (sic.) speakers at the Kinsey conference was Northwestern University psychology professor J. Michael Bailey. [1] Our illustrious friends at the NIH had supplied Bailey a $147,000 grant. The program - pay women to view pornography while using an instrument called a “plethysmograph.” So, what was the goal of this study? To measure the sexual responses of the women watching the porno flicks. I’m sure that Penthouse magazine et. al. would love to get a piece of that action. For 2004 how about these choice programs:
- Sexual habits of older men at the New England Research Institutes Inc. - $69,000.
- Drug use and HIV-related behavior by San Francisco’s Asian prostitutes/masseuses at the University of California-San-Francisco - $641,000.
- American Indian and Alaskan Native lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, and “two-spirited individuals (whatever that means) - $500,000.
It is also important to note that in 1995, Congress drafted a bill called the “Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act.” This bill, if passed, was to mandate that Congress investigate Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Male and/or Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. As Congress debated this bill, Indiana University almost closed the door of its campus guest, the Kinsey Institute. That was short-lived. The subversive foundations, Ford and Rockefeller, stepped in to provide funding to allow the kinky sex studies to continue unabated.
While not passed, the 1995 bill spurred interest outside the United States. A British documentary called “Secret History: Kinsey’s Pedophiles” exposed the lurid details. England broadcast the documentary on August 10, 1998. This film exposed the information contained in this paper and more.
In 2003, Hollywood produced a film called “Kinsey” that glorifies the work of the good (sic) “doctor.” Meanwhile, it omitted the detestable elements. Reports claim that the web page of the North American Man-Boy Love Association calls Kinsey its hero “in the struggle we fight today.” [3]
As we know, it is typical that those who have a so-called “liberal” agenda will thwart dialogue and debate. This is censorship of an overt nature by ignoring the facts. Bernie Goldberg in his book “Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News” and Tammy Bruce in her book “The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds” and other liberals have had the courage to speak out against this censorship. We need more good liberals to come out and break the silence about the sinister nature of this type of censorship. The silence of our mainstream media speaks volumes of the censorship of sex-education. It is sodomy/debauchery education of our children. This is an un-American activity and as such:
- College students now enroll in official classes that study pornographic films.
- Sex change operations are common to such a degree that a convicted criminal can demand that government pay his sex-change operation.
- The American Psychiatric Association in 1973 dropping homosexuality as a disorder and more recently considering removing adult-child sex.
As the cultural elitists debase Christian values, the sexologists along with their collaborators the postmodern secular humanists, propagate moral relativism. The media and teachers will follow suit and do the same. These words have no meaning to some of our liberal friends.
- Bailey’s latest book “The Man Who Would Be Queen” studies homosexuality and other aspects of sexual identity. At the July 2003 conference, he took part in a panel about “Gender, Age & Sexual Orientation” at the July 2003 conference.
- For example, the June 30, 2003 edition of Time Magazine was about Christians preaching in Muslim nations. Time is so concerned by this activity that its worries are best summed up by their statement: “Growing numbers of Evangelicals are trying to spread Christianity in Muslim lands. But is this what the world needs now?”
- Congress Should Probe and Defund the Kinseyites by Dr. Judith Reisman, Ph.D.; Human Events, October 20, 2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment